Projects

Italian Journalism in the Age of Silvio Berlusconi

What's happened to Italian news media in the last two decades, and what was it like before?

Reporting China

Chinese journalism after market reforms: the possibility and dangers of investigation.

Russian News is Good News

The remaking of Russian journalism, and Russian journalists, in the age of Vladimir Putin.

Independent Journalism in Post-Independence States

The perils and possibilities of holding power to account in different African countries.

The Pipers and the Tunes

A comparative perspective on the power of proprietors, public service and people to influence the content and limits of journalism.

The Peripheral Vision of Central Issues

How good is the coverage of matters essential to public welfare and the public interest? And who cares about it?

From works of art to virtual gazebos

firma.jpg

The role of signatures in Italian newspapers is changing

Signatures have always mattered for journalism. They matter for the readers, who can tell whether their favourite writers are on a certain edition of a newspaper. They also matter for journalists, who can acquire visibility and take pride in their work. The Economist, the one magazine which does not allow journalists to sign their articles, has always been seen as a different type of animal, a strange exception that only works because of its history and of its nature.

Lately, a different type of signature has started to matter in Italian journalism. As well as competing on the quality of writers' signatures, newspapers have started to compete on the number of readers' signatures they can collect on-line to support certain campaigns. This is true of newspapers on both the right and the left. A right-wing newspaper such as Libero has long collected signatures for a better school system and for the abolition of provinces. Similarly, the Berlusconi family-owned Il Giornale, has in the past collected signatures to promote change in Rai, which was seen as being too left-leaning.

A newspaper positioned on the centre-left of the political spectrum, La Repubblica, is now using this feature repeatedly. La Repubblica has collected signatures to defend press freedom in Italy as well as to defend women's dignity against certain expressions used by Berlusconi. It is now using them to promote a campaign against a law which would reduce the length of trials to an extent that, Repubblica says, many crimes would go unpunished. This last appeal is particularly interesting, as it was written by Roberto Saviano, the author of Gomorrah and one of the most well-known Italian writers. It therefore combines the traditional importance of having well-known authors signing the articles, with the more recent feature of collecting as many readers' signatures as possible.

That newspapers have now decided to acquire this new characteristic can be seen as a way to make the reader interact more with their newspaper, something which one would expect in the world of internet. However, it is also a consequence of their increased politicisation: newspapers want to influence the political debate and, to do so, they have to let politicians know that they have a solid base of consensus, too. Readership is an old-fashioned concept: the new  frontier of Italian journalism seems to show active readership, and signatures are the way to prove its weight.

We invite our readers to submit blogs similar to those posted on the website by our researchers. If you have strong views about journalism and politics that you'd like to share, submit your writing to us by emailing janice.winter@axessjournalism.com


Comments (2)

I have mixed feelings about this - I think of course it's important to 'give a face' to people who want to show some kind of activism, and give them (us) the opportunity to feel like we are able to do something. But at the same time, there seems to be a new petition to sign every other day - I can barely keep up. Don't you think this risks cheapening them?

Posted by rachele on November 17, 2009 - 2:04 AM

I have two remarks to make. Firstly, I share Rachele's concerns. These petitions appear as a way of legitimising what has been written by showing that there is a popular consensus behind them. I believe that the validity of an article should not be made dependent on the number of people that support the views expressed therein. Secondly, there is a risk that these petitions are seen as extensions of struggles between political parties. Considering the financial link between the Italian press and MPs' support, and given the recrudescence of political dialogue, these petitions look like tools used by politicians to hammer their opponents and hence they lose credibility. I think that a better strategy would be to reduce the number of petitions and keep them more focused on specific issues like the freedom of the press.

Posted by Giacomo Fassina on November 22, 2009 - 12:21 PM


Post a Comment

Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

(required)

(required)

Notify me on new comments