Axess Programme on Journalism and Democracy |
||
ProjectsItalian Journalism in the Age of Silvio BerlusconiWhat's happened to Italian news media in the last two decades, and what was it like before? Reporting ChinaChinese journalism after market reforms: the possibility and dangers of investigation. Russian News is Good NewsThe remaking of Russian journalism, and Russian journalists, in the age of Vladimir Putin. Independent Journalism in Post-Independence StatesThe perils and possibilities of holding power to account in different African countries. The Pipers and the TunesA comparative perspective on the power of proprietors, public service and people to influence the content and limits of journalism. The Peripheral Vision of Central IssuesHow good is the coverage of matters essential to public welfare and the public interest? And who cares about it? |
Searching for Berlusconi ancestorsSubmitted by Ferdinando Giugliano on October 24, 2009 - 5:43 PM
A new, unexpected character joins the list of those who preceded the Italian PM in understanding the importance of the link between media and politics. Scholars and journalists have analysed at great length the way in which Berlusconi has been a pioneer in understanding the power of the media and in using it to convey his political message. A related question is whether there has been someone who had somewhat paved his way on this particular aspect of political life. An obvious answer to this quest for Berlusconi's ancestors has been Bettino Craxi, the Socialist leader who served as Italian Prime Minister in the 1980s and famously fled the country to avoid being arrested over bribery charges. In his book Vent'Anni con Berlusconi, the historian Nicola Tranfaglia hints at how Craxi helped Berlusconi's career as a media entrepreneur as he had understood that Berlusconi's TV were transmitting programs which conveyed his own new values of individualism, consumerism and anti-communism. Conversely, Massimo Giannini, deputy editor and columnist for La Repubblica, has drawn a comparison between Berlusconi and Mussolini. In his book Lo Statista, Giannini suggests that both Berlusconi and Mussolini spent a great deal of attention in controlling the press and in creating myths, such as the one of the indefatigable leader or the one of the man-who-does-things. In a thought-provoking dialogue with Giuseppe d'Avanzo, the La Repubblica columnist who invented the now famous ten questions to Berlusconi, Paolo Sorrentino, the director of the movie il Divo on the life of Giulio Andreotti, suggests that the real ancestor of Berlusconi's understanding of the importance of media in politics is precisely the seven-times Prime Minister depicted in his movie. According to Sorrentino, Andreotti was "a pioneer”. “In the Italian establishment – Sorrentino continues - he was the first one to understand how politics is first of all media politics. Andreotti tried to appear to the people as a man of the people. He did not talk the exoteric language of politics, but the daily language of the people whose vote he asked for". Sorrentino recalls how Andreotti once made the unusual choice of presenting his latest book in the then most famous club in Rome, the Piper. "From this point of view - Sorrentino concludes - Andreotti can be seen as a precursor of Silvio Berlusconi's". That the tacit, reserved Andreotti and the flamboyant, gaffe-prone Berlusconi can be seen as two sides of the same coin is certainly a controversial thought. However, after reading the interview, one finds it very difficult to find this comparison out of place. We invite our readers to submit blogs similar to those posted on the website by our researchers. If you have strong views about journalism and politics that you'd like to share, submit your writing to us by emailing janice.winter@axessjournalism.com Comments (1)Post a CommentPlease allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting. |
Latest BlogpostsWhat we are readingHow Cablevision Is Destroying NewsdayBy Christopher Twarowski and Michael Patrick Nelson Freelance writing's unfortunate new modelBy James Rainey for the Los Angeles Times South Africa & worrying signs for press freedomMail & Guardian article by Dario Milo on concerning media legislation Related Pages |
In 2003 Agamben well wrote that (and sorry for the french, but there I couldn't find any english translation! ) "si le régime, qui, sous l'égide de Berlusconi, risque de s'installer durablement en Italie, est le pire qu'on puisse imaginer (...) c'est parce que ce régime a les moyens, en plus de l'intention, d'instaurer la plus étouffante des dictatures médiatiques. Grâce à elle, la falsification systématique de la vérité, du langage et de l'opinion, déjà largement en cours, deviendrait absolue et sans échappatoires ; toute critique serait abolie ; tout, littéralement tout, redeviendrait possible, y compris de nouveaux camps de concentration. Aucune complicité n'est admissible avec les forces qui soutiennent ce projet et les intellectuels qui se sont vendus à elles ne méritent que le mépris. En même temps, nous sommes conscients que, même si ces forces-là sont vaincues, il sera non moins nécessaire de surveiller ses vainqueurs, parce que le germe de la même idéologie est présent parmi eux aussi. Seules la lucidité et l'imagination, dégagées tant des vieilles idéologies que du nouveau credo libéralo-spectaculaire, pourront rendre aux hommes l'espace de leurs cités."
The wording is perhaps a little extreme, but the I agree with the "core" of his thought...
Posted by Cecilia Rubiolo on October 25, 2009 - 5:45 PM