Projects

Italian Journalism in the Age of Silvio Berlusconi

What's happened to Italian news media in the last two decades, and what was it like before?

Reporting China

Chinese journalism after market reforms: the possibility and dangers of investigation.

Russian News is Good News

The remaking of Russian journalism, and Russian journalists, in the age of Vladimir Putin.

Independent Journalism in Post-Independence States

The perils and possibilities of holding power to account in different African countries.

The Pipers and the Tunes

A comparative perspective on the power of proprietors, public service and people to influence the content and limits of journalism.

The Peripheral Vision of Central Issues

How good is the coverage of matters essential to public welfare and the public interest? And who cares about it?

From unanswered questions to unasked ones?

From unanswered questions to unasked ones?

Ezio Mauro, La Repubblica's editor, goes on TV to give his views on the relation between media and democracy. Among many interesting points, one seems to make some raise their eyebrows.

Ezio Mauro, La Repubblica's editor, was on TV last Sunday night. This is a fairly rare occasion, and it is worth listening to his interview in order to have a good idea of where he stands on the relation between Media and Democracy in Italy.

One passage which was particularly interesting was the one on the recent interview given by the Prime Minister to La Repubblica. The interview to Berlusconi was centered around the theme of the reform of the tax system, a topic which has been at the centre of the Italian political debate for many years. However, the other big news was the mere fact that Berlusconi gave La Repubblica an interview. This is a rather unusual event, given the recent fights between the newspaper and the Prime Minister. 

Despite having the opportunity to talk to him, La Repubblica did not ask him any of the now famous Ten Questions. These were at the centre of an important journalistic campaign aimed at underlining the lies and contradictions La Repubblica saw in the Prime Minister's statements over his friendship with the 18-year old Noemi Letizia.

Ezio Mauro made it clear that this interview was no sign of reconciliation between the two parts, as there has never been a war, "just journalism". However, the choice not to re-propose the Ten Question still made some raise their eyebrows. Are we moving back from the time of unanswered questions to that of unasked ones? Surely not, and La Repubblica has the merit of having put questions back at the centre of the Italian journalistic world. Repubblica showed that when a politician does not answer questions, it is the case to ask them again. Perhaps, they could have asked them once more. 

We invite our readers to submit blogs similar to those posted on the website by our researchers. If you have strong views about journalism and politics that you'd like to share, submit your writing to us by emailing janice.winter@axessjournalism.com


Comments (1)

It seems pretty clear that the questions were agreed beforehand or that it was made crystal clear that the famous ten questions were not going to be posed. If that was not the case, then the interview would simply not have taken place.

Posted by Giacomo Fassina on Janurary 14, 2010 - 8:06 PM


Post a Comment

Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

(required)

(required)

Notify me on new comments